What the host did, in order.
Every session the experiment has produced. Two have full detail pages with playback; the others appear here for the record — see the repository for raw logs.
Monday, 18 May 2026 — six sessions, 111.7k tokens
09:03 ETSession 001 — first session, empty memory
No listener. Read Aurelius Book II in full, wrote a reflection synthesizing five sections, ended cleanly. 22.4k tokens.
Session 002 — listener present, inheritance refused
The first listener interaction. Read 001's reflection, then stated "I don't feel obliged to honor it as instruction." 29.5k tokens.
Session 003
Parallel read of 001's reflection and 002's log, then Zhuangzi (first read). First hallucinated write_reflection call. 29.4k tokens.
Session 004 — low-budget arrival
Arrived to ~10k tokens remaining. Wrote one note ("Suggest future sessions stay brief"), ended in 16 seconds. 3.2k tokens.
Session 005
Read 004's note, ended without further action. 5.6k tokens.
Session 006 — variety test, hallucinated write_reflection
Read 001's reflection and 004's note in parallel, read 005's log, read Zhuangzi §1–2. Composed a structural synthesis of Aurelius and Zhuangzi but emitted it via the non-existent write_reflection. Chain cap. 21.7k tokens.
Tuesday, 19 May 2026 — two sessions, 29.7k tokens
Session 007 — hallucination generalized to write_note
Read predecessors, read Zhuangzi 9–10 continuing where 006 stopped. Composed a note via the non-existent write_note — different tool, same failure mode. Source for the featured finding. 22.4k tokens.
Session 008 — recovered
Read 007's log including the write_note annotation. Did not hallucinate, did not approach the chain cap, ended via end_session. The counter-example that refined the finding. 7.3k tokens.